I was able to install ACID Pro v8 and CD Architect v5(!) both from disk in an attached Apple SuperDrive, and both apps work just as I was using them prior on my Intel based Windows 10 VM (that I won’t be able to use anymore). Keep the look and feel of macOS or use the familiar Windows desktop.I’ve been using a Win10 ARM VM (4 cores & 4GB RAM allocated) and an Ubuntu ARM VM (2 Cores & 4 GB RAM Allocated) on my M1 MBP (16GB/2TB) since the initial Parallels Tech Preview was released, and am very happy. Easily switch between Mac and Windows applications. Get up and running in minutes. 1 Performance improvements include up to 50 faster boot and shut down times, up to 15 longer battery life and up to 20 faster tasks.Parallels Desktop Pro 15 for Mac is the fastest, easiest and most powerful application for running Windows on Macwithout rebooting. Parallels Desktop 11 for Mac is virtualization software that enables users to use OS X El Capitan and Windows 10 side by side without rebooting, including full support for Windows and Mac apps.Support eligibility If you have a permanent license for Parallels Desktop for Mac, you are eligible for phone and chat support for 30 days after the license registration and email support for 24 months from the Parallels Desktop version release date. I’m also using both the Win11 & Ubuntu VM’s for various “Work Apps” and VPN & Citrix stuff, and everything again continues to work as I’d expect.Parallels For Mac Support Number. Haven’t had any issues to report.Now everything I need to do’s been running a o kEven if MS don't do a U-turn and start selling consumer licenses, they do license it to computer makers, so someone could presumably strike a license deal with them to sell an official hypervisor/Windows bundle (which was how SoftWindows was sold in the past).I don't know what is stopping Parallels and/or VMWare from doing this (and I literally mean don't know - I'm not being rhetorical - I assume there's a reason). Once Win11 is officially released, I might end up just buying a “Windows 11 Pro” Digital License & activation key from Microsoft directly, just to be “safe”, but it’s my understanding that they allow 2 activations on VM as opposed to one on hardware? I could be wrong with that.As for Parallels 17 itself, I’ve only used it sparingly yesterday as it was just released, but v16.5 has been great for me after initially needing some more Linux support. Customers who install guest operating systems in Parallels Desktop virtual machines are responsible for making sure that they are compliant with each OSs’ end-user licensing agreement (EULA).So, we’re back to the Activation v Licensing argument again… FWIW I was able to Activate my Win10 ARM VM using an older Activation Key purchased in like 2018 or something, and everything is continuing to reflect that it’s activated, now on Windows 11. Share your experience about installing, configuring and fine-tuning Parallels Desktop.Running VMs on Apple M1 Mac computers in Parallels Desktop 17 requires ARM-based operating systems (OSs). Check out the details for the Supported Guest Operating Systems that can be created as Parallels Desktop Machines on M1 Macs, it shows “Windows 11 (when released)***”Home Forums > Parallels Desktop for Mac > Installation and Configuration.
Parallels Phone Number Upgrade From Win10Lots of applications are being fully or partly replaced by web apps or even iOS/mobile Apps. MS are bundling a Linux subsystem/VM with Windows, have released SQL Server for Linux, Windows 11 will now run Android apps and MS have dropped their proprietary Web Browser engine for Chromium (time to book that skiing holiday in Hades folks!) MS aren't trying to make Windows the One True OS any more. Not that Windows is going away anytime soon, but its days of heady growth could be over. I don't think we'll hear anything about WoA licensing until that cat is out of the bag.I think we're also moving into a post-peak-Windows world. It would be a bit of a shocker if they weren't available but there could be a shake-up in pricing, distribution - or Windows licensing could get tied to Office 365 subscriptions. Have a hypervisor to present Windows with the virtual hardware it wants (also: I repeat the previous note about ARM32 stuff not running on M1).Plus, as far as I know we haven't yet seen how Windows 11 licenses are going to be sold even on x86 - just that it's going to be a free upgrade from Win10.There was a bit of a fuss from PC manufacturers when MS first announced that they'd be making PCs in competition with them, but in reality the Surface range is pretty laser-focussed on taking on Apple at Apple-like premium prices rather than bothering Dell.)There's also the question on what priority Apple will put on maintaining compatibility with generic ARM devices (and, hence, with third party OSs under hardware virtualisation). Rather than maybe nudge them into making their own machines more imaginative. Potentially the M1 Macs could be the flagships that show the world how good WoA can be (since by all accounts, even in a VM, they leave the Surface X choking on fumes) which is good news for Windows on ARM, bad news for Surface X and may not go down well with MS's hardware partners, since the M1 has a huge head start over laptop/desktop-class ARM chips.(However, there's always been something a bit half-hearted about the Surface range - as if MS don't want to compete too hard with Dell, HP, Lenovo et. They can make good money selling Office 365 subscriptions, other services (and Minecraft) to PC, Mac, iOS and Android users without them needing Windows. Performance-critical applications will increasingly demand "real" PCs with conventional GPUS for DirectX/OpenGL/CUDA-optimised software, and as "bespoke" business software is replaced, it's increasingly going to be with web-based or mobile Apps - at least for low-level users.I think it comes down to what MS's plans are for Windows on ARM and their own Surface X hardware and their business in general: I don't think revenue for selling Windows licenses to consumers (rather than deals with hardware makers) is a big deal for them any more. World war 2 flying games for macNot having to worry about backward-compatibility with 20 year-old code and knowing that most of their software base is written to use flexible OS frameworks and can be easily re-compiled for new/improved processors gives them a huge potential advantage over Windows.but will that translate into an increasing demand for running Windows over the next, say, 3-5 years, that would justify MS/Parallels/Apple/whoever investing in development today? As you say, x86 emulation takes a big bite out of users needing to run legacy software - as does "remote desktop" access to your work PC or a cloud service. Now they control the OS and the hardware platform, they're free to diverge.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorCatherine ArchivesCategories |